Glossar-English:Image Syntax: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Glossar der Bildphilosophie
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
Joerg R.J. Schirra (Diskussion | Beiträge)
Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „<!-- "This is comment" --> <!--Vorlage für Hauptpunkte--> <!--Den folgenden Header, bitte nicht verändern--> {{GlosHeader}} Kategorie:Hauptpunkt Kate…“
 
Joerg R.J. Schirra (Diskussion | Beiträge)
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Zeile 5: Zeile 5:
[[Kategorie:Hauptpunkt]]
[[Kategorie:Hauptpunkt]]
[[Kategorie:Bilder als Zeichen]]
[[Kategorie:Bilder als Zeichen]]
Hauptpunkt zu: [[Bilder als Zeichen]]
Main-Item of: [[Bilder als Zeichen|Images as Signs]]
 
Original: [[Bildsyntax]]
{{GlosTab1}}
{{GlosTab1}}
{{GlossarBoxMain}}
{{GlossarBoxMain}}
<!--Ende header-->
<!--Ende header-->
<!--Ab hier: eigentlicher Inhalt-->
<!--Ab hier: eigentlicher Inhalt-->
==Die relevante Struktur von Bild&shy;trägern==
==The relevant structure of image carriers==
Die Fragestellung der Bild&shy;syntax als dem einge&shy;schränktes&shy;ten Bereich bei der Behand&shy;lung von Bildern als Zeichen fokus&shy;siert auf die Eigen&shy;schaften bild&shy;hafter [[Zeichenträger|Zeichen&shy;träger]] und den Rela&shy;tionen zwischen ihnen, ohne dass die [[Bildsemantik|Bedeu&shy;tungs-]] oder [[Bildpragmatik|Handlungs&shy;aspek&shy;te]] des Bildes dabei eine wesent&shy;liche Rolle spielen. Das heißt, dass hier vor allem physi&shy;sche Aspek&shy;te in Betracht gezo&shy;gen werden, die einem Gegen&shy;stand zukom&shy;men müssen, damit er als Bild funktio&shy;nieren kann, wobei in der Regel nicht alle physi&shy;schen Charak&shy;teris&shy;tika eines Gegen&shy;standes rele&shy;vant sind. Damit steht das Thema Bild&shy;syntax in großer inhalt&shy;licher Nähe zur Diskus&shy;sion der [[Materialität|Mate&shy;riali&shy;tät]] von Bildern in der kunstge&shy;schichtli&shy;chen Tradi&shy;tion sowie gene&shy;rell den eher onto&shy;logisch ausge&shy;richte&shy;ten Teilen der [[Bildlichkeit: Bedingungen und Folgen|Bildlich&shy;keitsde&shy;batte]].


The question of image syntax as the most restricted area in the treatment of images as signs focuses on the properties of pictorial [[Zeichenträger|sign carriers]] and the relations between them, without the [[Bildsemantik|meaning]] or [[Bildpragmatik|action aspects]] of the image playing a significant role. This means that physical aspects are primarily considered here that an object must have in order for it to function as an image, although not all physical characteristics of an object are usually relevant. The topic of image syntax is therefore very close to the discussion of the [[Materialität|materiality]] of images in the art historical tradition as well as in general the more ontologically oriented parts of the [[Bildlichkeit: Bedingungen und Folgen|image debate]].


==Zu den Unterpunkten==


Die Schlagworte zur Bild&shy;syntax lassen sich grob unter&shy;gliedern in solche, die den Gegen&shy;stand der Bildsyn&shy;tax näher bestim&shy;men, solche, die den Aspek&shy;ten der syntak&shy;tischen Orga&shy;nisa&shy;tion bildhaf&shy;ter Zeichen&shy;syste&shy;me gewid&shy;met sind, solche, die die spezi&shy;fischen Ele&shy;mente der bildsyn&shy;takti&shy;schen Struktu&shy;ren nachzeich&shy;nen, und schließ&shy;lich solche, die einen Anwen&shy;dungsas&shy;pekt berück&shy;sichti&shy;gen.
==On the sub-items==


===Der Gegenstand der Bild&shy;syntax===
The keywords for image syntax can be roughly subdivided into those that define the subject matter of the image syntax more precisely, those that are dedicated to aspects of the syntactic organization of pictorial sign systems, those that trace the specific elements of the pictorial syntactic structures, and finally those that describe an application aspect take into account.
Obzwar die Bildsyntax nur einen sehr einge&shy;schränkten Aspekt der Bildver&shy;wendung ins Auge fasst, ist ihr Gegen&shy;stand, der [[Bildträger|Bild&shy;träger]] grundle&shy;gend zur Bestim&shy;mung vieler bildse&shy;manti&shy;scher und bildprag&shy;mati&shy;scher Frage&shy;stellun&shy;gen. Insbe&shy;sonde&shy;re geht es um die Frage, wie groß unter Umstän&shy;den die Vari&shy;anzen der rele&shy;vanten physi&shy;schen Eigen&shy;schaften sein dürfen, um Bildträ&shy;ger noch als dassel&shy;be Bild verwen&shy;den zu können. Die [[Identitätskriterien für Bildträger|Iden&shy;tität von Bildern]] hängt von dieser Frage nach dem [[Materialität und Bildsyntax|syntak&shy;tischen Mate&shy;rial]] ab und führt letzt&shy;lich weiter zur Frage nach der Einzig&shy;artig&shy;keit des [[Original|Ori&shy;ginals]] gegen&shy;über von [[Replika|Kopien und Repro&shy;duktio&shy;nen]]. Genau genom&shy;men bleiben umge&shy;kehrt auch seman&shy;tische und pragma&shy;tische Betrach&shy;tungen, obwohl sie nomi&shy;nell ausge&shy;klammert werden, für das Formu&shy;lieren und Ausrich&shy;ten der syntak&shy;tischen Frage&shy;stellun&shy;gen von zentra&shy;ler Wichtig&shy;keit, lassen sich doch Bildträ&shy;ger in ihrer Funktion ''als Bildträ&shy;ger'' letzt&shy;lich immer nur hinsicht&shy;lich des tatsäch&shy;lichen, inten&shy;dierten oder hypo&shy;thetisch betrach&shy;teten Gebrauchs als Bild bestim&shy;men (⊳ [[Bildrezeption als Kommunikationsprozess|Bildre&shy;zeption als Kommu&shy;nika&shy;tionspro&shy;zess]]).  


===Die bildsyntaktische Orga&shy;nisation===  
===The subject of image syntax===
Die mögliche Varianz der Bild&shy;träger verweist ande&shy;rerseits darauf, dass – als Zeichen betrach&shy;tet – kein Bild für sich allei&shy;ne begrif&shy;fen werden kann: Es ist immer Teil eines Zeichen&shy;systems. In Analogie zur Sprachgram&shy;matik kann daher gefragt werden nach kombi&shy;nato&shy;rischen Regel&shy;syste&shy;men über den rele&shy;vanten physi&shy;schen Eigen&shy;schaften der Bild&shy;träger, mit denen genau die syntak&shy;tisch wohlge&shy;formten von den [[syntaktisch unkorrekte Bilder|syntak&shy;tisch nicht wohlge&shy;formten Bildern]] (insge&shy;samt oder zumin&shy;dest in einem Teilbe&shy;reich) unter&shy;schieden werden können sollen. Ob eine solche [[Bildgrammatik|Bildgram&shy;matik]] eher im Sinne einer Transfor&shy;mations&shy;gramma&shy;tik verstan&shy;den werden sollte, oder ob ein davon zu unter&shy;scheiden&shy;des kombi&shy;nato&shy;risches System der [[Bildmorphologie|Bildmor&shy;pholo&shy;gie]] zu adä&shy;quate&shy;ren Beschrei&shy;bungen führt, hängt auch von der Situation ab, in der das jewei&shy;lige syntak&shy;tische Regel&shy;werk verwen&shy;det wird. In jedem Fall geht es um die [[Komposition|Kompo&shy;sition]] mehr oder weni&shy;ger elemen&shy;tarer syntak&shy;tischer Bau&shy;steine, die in diesem Zusam&shy;menhang hinsicht&shy;lich [[Eigenwerte, Abbildungswerte und Darstellungswerte syntaktischer Einheiten|Eigen&shy;werten, Abbil&shy;dungswer&shy;ten und Darstel&shy;lungswer&shy;ten]] diffe&shy;renziert werden können.  
Although the syntax of the image only envisages a very limited aspect of the use of the image, its object, the [[Bildträger|image carrier]], is fundamental to the determination of many image-semantic and image-pragmatic issues. In particular, the question is how large the variances of the relevant physical properties may be in order to still be able to use the image carrier as the same image. The [[Identitätskriterien für Bildträger|identity of images]] depends on this question of syntactic [[Materialität und Bildsyntax|material]] and ultimately leads further to the question of the uniqueness of the [[Original|original]] compared to [[Replika|copies and reproductions]]. Strictly speaking, conversely, semantic and pragmatic considerations remain of central importance for formulating and aligning the syntactical questions, although they are nominally excluded, since image carriers in their function ''as image carriers'' can ultimately only be viewed with regard to the actual, intended, or hypothetical use as determine the image (⊳ [[Bildrezeption als Kommunikationsprozess|Image reception as a communication process).


===Die Elemente der Bild&shy;syntax===
===The image syntactic organization===
Die Menge der syntak&shy;tischen Bau&shy;steine selbst lässt sich allge&shy;mein in zwei Gruppen unter&shy;gliedern: Einer&shy;seits eine rela&shy;tiona&shy;le ''Basis&shy;struktur'', die eine Reihe von Dimen&shy;sionen aufspannt, in der ande&shy;rerseits ''Marker&shy;werte'' ange&shy;ordnet sind. Während bei musi&shy;kali&shy;schen Zeichen&shy;syste&shy;men audi&shy;tive Marker&shy;werte in einer tempo&shy;ralen Basis&shy;struktur arran&shy;giert werden und in sprach&shy;lichen Zeichen&shy;syste&shy;men eine netzför&shy;mige, arbit&shy;räre, durch eine Gramma&shy;tik bestimm&shy;te Basis&shy;struktur mit Lexe&shy;men bestückt ist, stehen für die bildhaf&shy;ten Zeichen&shy;syste&shy;me offen&shy;sichtlich visu&shy;elle Marker&shy;werte in einer flächig-räumli&shy;chen Basis&shy;struktur im Zentrum des Inte&shy;resses.<ref>Von der Di&shy;men&shy;si&shy;on »Zeit«, die zu&shy;min&shy;dest für be&shy;weg&shy;te Bil&shy;der ei&shy;ne eben&shy;so wich&shy;ti&shy;ge Rol&shy;le spielt, wird an die&shy;ser Stel&shy;le ab&shy;ge&shy;se&shy;hen. Vgl. hier&shy;zu die Glos&shy;sar&shy;ein&shy;trä&shy;ge [[Animation|Ani&shy;ma&shy;ti&shy;on]], [[Film]] und [[Video|Vi&shy;deo]].</ref>
On the other hand, the possible variance of the image carriers indicates that – viewed as a sign – no image can be understood on its own: It is always part of a sign system. In analogy to the grammar of a language, combinatorial rule systems can therefore be asked about the relevant physical properties of the image carriers, with which precisely the syntactically well-formed images can be distinguished from the [[syntaktisch unkorrekte Bilder|syntactically not well-formed images]] (overall or at least in a sub-area). Whether such an [[Bildgrammatik|image grammar]] should be understood more in the sense of a transformation grammar, or whether a combinatorial system of [[Bildmorphologie|image morphology]] to be distinguished from it leads to more adequate descriptions also depends on the situation in which the particular syntactic rule is used. In any case, it is about the [[Komposition|composition]] of more or less elementary syntactic building blocks, which in this context can be differentiated in terms of their [[Eigenwerte, Abbildungswerte und Darstellungswerte syntaktischer Einheiten|intrinsic values, depictive values​​, and presentational values]].
 
===The elements of image syntax===
The set of syntactic building blocks can generally be divided into two groups: on the one hand, a relational ''basic structure'' that spans a series of dimensions, in which marker values ​​are arranged on the other hand. While in musical sign systems auditory ''marker values'' ​​are arranged in a temporal basic structure and in linguistic sign systems a net-like, arbitrary basic structure determined by a grammar is equipped with lexemes, for the pictorial sign systems visual marker values ​​in a flat-spatial basic structure are obviously the focus of interest.<ref>The dimension »time«, which plays an equally important role, at least for moving images, is disregarded at this point. See the glossary entries [[Animation|animation]], [[Film|film]], and [[Video|video]].</ref>
:
:
Ganz entsprechend steht das Schlag&shy;wort [[Raum und Geometrie|Raum und Geome&shy;trie]] für die Mannig&shy;faltig&shy;keit der bildsyn&shy;takti&shy;schen Basis&shy;struktur, stellen doch geo&shy;metri&shy;sche Kalkü&shy;le bereits seit der Anti&shy;ke eine hervor&shy;ragen&shy;de Form des ratio&shy;nalen Begrei&shy;fens von Raum dar. Störun&shy;gen in dieser Basis&shy;struktur sind ein wesent&shy;licher Faktor für [[syntaktisch unkorrekte Bilder|syntak&shy;tisch unkor&shy;rekte Bilder]]. Ein spezi&shy;fisches Attri&shy;but des Raumes, die [[Syntaktische Dichte|Dichte]] der Anord&shy;nung von Raumstel&shy;len, hat zudem eine wichti&shy;ge Rolle in der jünge&shy;ren Bilddis&shy;kussion gespielt.  
Correspondingly, the entry [[Raum und Geometrie|Space and geometry]] stands for the diversity of the pictorial syntactic basic structure, since geometric calculi have represented an excellent form of rational understanding of space since antiquity. Disturbances in this basic structure are a significant factor for [[syntaktisch unkorrekte Bilder|syntactically incorrect pictures]]. A specific attribute of space, the [[Syntaktische Dichte|density]] of the arrangement of spatial locations, has also played an important role in the recent pictorial discussion.
:
:
Der Diskurs über die bildsyn&shy;takti&shy;schen Marker&shy;werte konzen&shy;triert sich vor allem auf die komple&shy;xe Mannig&shy;faltig&shy;keit der [[Farbe als bildsyntaktische Kategorie|Farben]], durch die die zugrun&shy;de liegen&shy;de räumlich-flächi&shy;ge bildsyn&shy;takti&shy;sche Struktur über&shy;haupt erst wahrnehm&shy;bar wird. Doch sollte nicht verges&shy;sen werden, dass es eine Reihe von Argu&shy;menten gibt, [[Textur|Textu&shy;ren]] als eigen&shy;ständi&shy;ges, auf den Farbdi&shy;mensio&shy;nen aufset&shy;zendes System von Marker&shy;werten zweiter Ordnung zu begrei&shy;fen. Schließ&shy;lich werden auch mit den Themen [[Reflexion und Transparenz|Refle&shy;xion und Transpa&shy;renz]] weite&shy;re grundle&shy;gende Aspek&shy;te bildre&shy;levan&shy;ter visu&shy;eller Eigen&shy;schaften ange&shy;sprochen, die von den Farbtheo&shy;rien im enge&shy;ren Sinn in der Regel nicht berück&shy;sichtigt werden, aber ganz spezi&shy;fische bildsyn&shy;takti&shy;sche Funkti&shy;onen über&shy;nehmen können.
The discourse on the image-syntactic marker values ​​concentrates primarily on the complex variety of [[Farbe als bildsyntaktische Kategorie|colors]], through which the underlying spatial-surface image-syntactic structure first becomes perceptible. However, it should not be forgotten that there are a number of arguments for understanding [[Textur|textures]] as an independent system of second-order marker values ​​based on the color dimensions. Finally, also with the topics of [[Reflexion und Transparenz|reflection and transparency]] further fundamental aspects of image-relevant visual properties are addressed, which are not usually taken into account by color theories in the narrower sense, but which can take on very specific image-syntactic functions.
 
===Der Anwendungsaspekt===
Für konkrete, insbe&shy;sonde&shy;re techni&shy;sche Anwen&shy;dungen ist bildsyn&shy;taktisch vor allem der Begriff der [[Auflösung|Auflö&shy;sung]] wichtig. Die bildsyn&shy;takti&shy;schen Über&shy;legun&shy;gen sind dabei für das digi&shy;tale Speichern und Verar&shy;beiten von Bild(trä&shy;gern) wie auch für deren maschi&shy;nelle Verviel&shy;fälti&shy;gung und Über&shy;tragung von entschei&shy;dender Bedeu&shy;tung, da auch hierbei in der Regel von Bedeu&shy;tungs- und Handlungs&shy;aspek&shy;ten ganz abge&shy;sehen wird. In der [[Bildbearbeitung, digitale|digi&shy;talen Bildbe&shy;arbei&shy;tung]], einem Teilge&shy;biet der [[Computervisualistik|Compu&shy;tervi&shy;sualis&shy;tik]], geht es um solche algo&shy;rithmi&shy;schen Verfah&shy;ren, mit denen – u.a. aus ana&shy;logen Bildern – auto&shy;matisch möglichst passen&shy;de digi&shy;tale Bildträ&shy;ger erstellt und auf vielfäl&shy;tige Weise modi&shy;fiziert werden können.  


===The application aspect===
For concrete, especially technical applications, the concept of [[Auflösung|resolution]] is particularly important in terms of image syntax. The visual syntactic considerations are of crucial importance for the digital storage and processing of image (carriers) as well as for their mechanical duplication and transmission, since here too, as a rule, aspects of meaning and action are completely disregarded. [[Bildbearbeitung, digitale|Digital image processing]], a sub-area of ​​[[Computervisualistik|computational visualistics]], deals with such algorithmic processes with which the most suitable digital image carrier can be automatically created and modified in a variety of ways – from analog images, among other things.


==Sonstiges==
==Miscellaneous==
Der Aspekt der Bild&shy;syntax spielt eben&shy;falls für viele [[Bilder als Medien|medien&shy;theore&shy;tische Betrach&shy;tungen]] eine Rolle.  
The aspect of image syntax also plays a role in many [[Bilder als Medien|media-theoretical considerations]].  


{{GlosTab2}}
{{GlosTab2}}

Version vom 2. August 2023, 17:49 Uhr

Main-Item of: Images as Signs

Original: Bildsyntax


The relevant structure of image carriers

The question of image syntax as the most restricted area in the treatment of images as signs focuses on the properties of pictorial sign carriers and the relations between them, without the meaning or action aspects of the image playing a significant role. This means that physical aspects are primarily considered here that an object must have in order for it to function as an image, although not all physical characteristics of an object are usually relevant. The topic of image syntax is therefore very close to the discussion of the materiality of images in the art historical tradition as well as in general the more ontologically oriented parts of the image debate.


On the sub-items

The keywords for image syntax can be roughly subdivided into those that define the subject matter of the image syntax more precisely, those that are dedicated to aspects of the syntactic organization of pictorial sign systems, those that trace the specific elements of the pictorial syntactic structures, and finally those that describe an application aspect take into account.

The subject of image syntax

Although the syntax of the image only envisages a very limited aspect of the use of the image, its object, the image carrier, is fundamental to the determination of many image-semantic and image-pragmatic issues. In particular, the question is how large the variances of the relevant physical properties may be in order to still be able to use the image carrier as the same image. The identity of images depends on this question of syntactic material and ultimately leads further to the question of the uniqueness of the original compared to copies and reproductions. Strictly speaking, conversely, semantic and pragmatic considerations remain of central importance for formulating and aligning the syntactical questions, although they are nominally excluded, since image carriers in their function as image carriers can ultimately only be viewed with regard to the actual, intended, or hypothetical use as determine the image (⊳ [[Bildrezeption als Kommunikationsprozess|Image reception as a communication process).

The image syntactic organization

On the other hand, the possible variance of the image carriers indicates that – viewed as a sign – no image can be understood on its own: It is always part of a sign system. In analogy to the grammar of a language, combinatorial rule systems can therefore be asked about the relevant physical properties of the image carriers, with which precisely the syntactically well-formed images can be distinguished from the syntactically not well-formed images (overall or at least in a sub-area). Whether such an image grammar should be understood more in the sense of a transformation grammar, or whether a combinatorial system of image morphology to be distinguished from it leads to more adequate descriptions also depends on the situation in which the particular syntactic rule is used. In any case, it is about the composition of more or less elementary syntactic building blocks, which in this context can be differentiated in terms of their intrinsic values, depictive values​​, and presentational values.

The elements of image syntax

The set of syntactic building blocks can generally be divided into two groups: on the one hand, a relational basic structure that spans a series of dimensions, in which marker values ​​are arranged on the other hand. While in musical sign systems auditory marker values ​​are arranged in a temporal basic structure and in linguistic sign systems a net-like, arbitrary basic structure determined by a grammar is equipped with lexemes, for the pictorial sign systems visual marker values ​​in a flat-spatial basic structure are obviously the focus of interest.[1]

Correspondingly, the entry Space and geometry stands for the diversity of the pictorial syntactic basic structure, since geometric calculi have represented an excellent form of rational understanding of space since antiquity. Disturbances in this basic structure are a significant factor for syntactically incorrect pictures. A specific attribute of space, the density of the arrangement of spatial locations, has also played an important role in the recent pictorial discussion.

The discourse on the image-syntactic marker values ​​concentrates primarily on the complex variety of colors, through which the underlying spatial-surface image-syntactic structure first becomes perceptible. However, it should not be forgotten that there are a number of arguments for understanding textures as an independent system of second-order marker values ​​based on the color dimensions. Finally, also with the topics of reflection and transparency further fundamental aspects of image-relevant visual properties are addressed, which are not usually taken into account by color theories in the narrower sense, but which can take on very specific image-syntactic functions.

The application aspect

For concrete, especially technical applications, the concept of resolution is particularly important in terms of image syntax. The visual syntactic considerations are of crucial importance for the digital storage and processing of image (carriers) as well as for their mechanical duplication and transmission, since here too, as a rule, aspects of meaning and action are completely disregarded. Digital image processing, a sub-area of ​​computational visualistics, deals with such algorithmic processes with which the most suitable digital image carrier can be automatically created and modified in a variety of ways – from analog images, among other things.

Miscellaneous

The aspect of image syntax also plays a role in many media-theoretical considerations.

Anmerkungen
  1. ↑ The dimension »time«, which plays an equally important role, at least for moving images, is disregarded at this point. See the glossary entries animation, film, and video.
Literatur

Es wurden keine Literaturverweise im Artikel gefunden.

Ausgabe 1: 2013

Verantwortlich:

Seitenbearbeitungen durch: Joerg R.J. Schirra — (Hinweis)