Glossar-English:Sign theories: Overview: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
||
| Zeile 12: | Zeile 12: | ||
<!--Ende header--> | <!--Ende header--> | ||
<!--Ab hier: eigentlicher Inhalt--> | <!--Ab hier: eigentlicher Inhalt--> | ||
== | == What does the expression ‘sign’ mean?== | ||
Before addressing the question of whether or in what sense images are to be understood as signs, agreement should first be reached on what is actually meant by the term 'sign'. This clarification is by no means trivial, as the term is used in many different meanings both historically and in current discussions. The present main point therefore brings together a series of treatises on general and fundamental aspects of what should (reasonably) be regarded as characteristic of signs and in what context. [1] | |||
= | Before addressing the question of whether or in what sense images are to be understood as signs, an agreement should first be reached on what is actually meant by the term ‘sign’. This clarification is by no means trivial since the expression is used in many different meanings, both historically and in contemporary discussions. The present main point therefore gathers a number of approaches on general and fundamental aspects of what (meaningfully) should be taken to be characteristic of signs and in what context.<ref>An in-depth overview of semiotics as a basic theory for considerations in image science and image philosophy can be found in <bib id='Birk et al. 2014a'></bib>.</ref> | ||
==About the sub items== | |||
These items can be casually arranged into three groups: | |||
: | : | ||
The topics of the first group refer to the theoretical environment of sign theories and, connected to this, to general characterizations of signs. Thereby the complex [[Glossar-English:Sign, Sign Carrier, Sign System|‘Sign, Sign Carrier, Sign System’]] is in the center. At least the more recent semiotic approaches are based on an action-theoretical foundation of the concept of signs, which places it in the context of the concepts of [[Glossar-English:Interaction and Communication|»interaction«, »communication«]], and [[Glossar-English:Modality|»modality«]]. With [[Glossar-English:Pragmatics, Semantics, Syntax|'pragmatics, semantics, and syntax']], a traditional distinction of semiotics is also examined in more detail, which also classifies the lemmata of this glossary concerning pictorial semiotics in the narrower sense. In addition, one lemma each is dedicated to a particularly important concept or pair of concepts of this tripartite division: Pragmatically, the concept [[Glossar-English:Context|»context«]] plays an important role; semantically, the distinction between [[Bedeutung und Referenz|»meaning« and »reference«]] is relevant; finally, on the level of sign carriers, the differentiation between [[Glossar-English:Morphology and Syntax|»syntax« and »morphology«]] is especially significant for considerations in the philosophy of images. | |||
: | : | ||
In | A second group of topics deals with important components of signs. In the general framework considered here, especially the concepts derived from the semiotic consideration of human language are recapitulated and examined in their usefulness for the application in image theory: It is in this group that the linguistic-philosophical quartet of [[Kompetenz, Performanz, Illokution|»illocution«]], [[Glossar-English:Proposition|»proposition«]], as well as [[Glossar-English:Nomination|»nomination«]] and [[Glossar-English:Predication|»predication«]] as parts of the proposition are primarily considered. On a more general level of action theory, the distinction between [[Glossar-English:Interactional, Expressive, and Propositional Angles|»interactional«, »expressive«, and »propositional angles«]] of signs furthermore allows for a cross-connection of those four linguistic-philosophical terms to the topics of »interaction«, »communication«, »truth«, and »truthfulness/honesty«, which cannot be neglected for image-semiotic considerations either. | ||
: | : | ||
Special classes of signs are considered in the third group: This is particularly about Peirce's differentiation of symbolic, indexical and iconic signs and about the concept of notations, which is important for Goodman's symbol theory and which also has practical significance in the digital-technical coding of image carriers (⊳ Image processing, digital ). | |||
Special classes of signs are considered in the third group: Here, we are particularly concerned with Peirce's differentiation of [[Symbol, Index, Ikon|symbolic, indexical, and iconic signs]] and with the concept of [[Notation|notations]] important for Goodman's symbol theory; both also have quite practical significance, for instance, in the digital-technical coding of image carriers (⊳ [[Bildverarbeitung, digitale|Digital Image Processing]]). | |||
{{GlosTab2}} | {{GlosTab2}} | ||
| Zeile 32: | Zeile 37: | ||
<!--Hier die entsprechende Textpassage einfügen--> | <!--Hier die entsprechende Textpassage einfügen--> | ||
<!-- Zeilen sollten diese Form haben (XYZ jeweils ersetzen): * [[XYZ]] --> | <!-- Zeilen sollten diese Form haben (XYZ jeweils ersetzen): * [[XYZ]] --> | ||
* [[Hilfe:Entschuldigung1| | * [[Hilfe:Entschuldigung1|Competence, Performance, Illocution -]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Glossar-English:Context|Context]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Glossar-English:Interaction and Communication|Interaction and Communication]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Glossar-English:Interactional, Expressive, and Propositional Angles|Interactional, Expressive, and Propositional Angles]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Hilfe:Entschuldigung1|Meaning and Reference -]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Glossar-English:Modality|Modality]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Glossar-English:Morphology and Syntax|Morphology and Syntax]] | ||
* [[Nomination]] | * [[Glossar-English:Nomination|Nomination]] | ||
* [[Notation]] | * [[Notation]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Glossar-English:Pragmatics, Semantics, Syntax|Pragmatics, Semantics, Syntax]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Glossar-English:Predication|Predication]] | ||
* [[Proposition]] | * [[Glossar-English:Proposition|Proposition]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Glossar-English:Sign, Sign Carrier, Sign System|Sign, Sign Carrier, Sign System]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Symbol, Index, Ikon|Symbol, Index, Icon]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Version vom 25. August 2023, 17:09 Uhr
Main Item of: Images as Signs
Original: Zeichentheorien: Übersicht
What does the expression ‘sign’ mean?Before addressing the question of whether or in what sense images are to be understood as signs, agreement should first be reached on what is actually meant by the term 'sign'. This clarification is by no means trivial, as the term is used in many different meanings both historically and in current discussions. The present main point therefore brings together a series of treatises on general and fundamental aspects of what should (reasonably) be regarded as characteristic of signs and in what context. [1] Before addressing the question of whether or in what sense images are to be understood as signs, an agreement should first be reached on what is actually meant by the term ‘sign’. This clarification is by no means trivial since the expression is used in many different meanings, both historically and in contemporary discussions. The present main point therefore gathers a number of approaches on general and fundamental aspects of what (meaningfully) should be taken to be characteristic of signs and in what context.[1]
About the sub itemsThese items can be casually arranged into three groups: The topics of the first group refer to the theoretical environment of sign theories and, connected to this, to general characterizations of signs. Thereby the complex ‘Sign, Sign Carrier, Sign System’ is in the center. At least the more recent semiotic approaches are based on an action-theoretical foundation of the concept of signs, which places it in the context of the concepts of »interaction«, »communication«, and »modality«. With 'pragmatics, semantics, and syntax', a traditional distinction of semiotics is also examined in more detail, which also classifies the lemmata of this glossary concerning pictorial semiotics in the narrower sense. In addition, one lemma each is dedicated to a particularly important concept or pair of concepts of this tripartite division: Pragmatically, the concept »context« plays an important role; semantically, the distinction between »meaning« and »reference« is relevant; finally, on the level of sign carriers, the differentiation between »syntax« and »morphology« is especially significant for considerations in the philosophy of images. A second group of topics deals with important components of signs. In the general framework considered here, especially the concepts derived from the semiotic consideration of human language are recapitulated and examined in their usefulness for the application in image theory: It is in this group that the linguistic-philosophical quartet of »illocution«, »proposition«, as well as »nomination« and »predication« as parts of the proposition are primarily considered. On a more general level of action theory, the distinction between »interactional«, »expressive«, and »propositional angles« of signs furthermore allows for a cross-connection of those four linguistic-philosophical terms to the topics of »interaction«, »communication«, »truth«, and »truthfulness/honesty«, which cannot be neglected for image-semiotic considerations either. Special classes of signs are considered in the third group: This is particularly about Peirce's differentiation of symbolic, indexical and iconic signs and about the concept of notations, which is important for Goodman's symbol theory and which also has practical significance in the digital-technical coding of image carriers (⊳ Image processing, digital ). Special classes of signs are considered in the third group: Here, we are particularly concerned with Peirce's differentiation of symbolic, indexical, and iconic signs and with the concept of notations important for Goodman's symbol theory; both also have quite practical significance, for instance, in the digital-technical coding of image carriers (⊳ Digital Image Processing). |
Sub-Items
Notes
Literature
[Birk et al. 2014a]Birk, Elisabeth & Halawa, Mark A. & Mosbach, Doris (2014): Semiotik. In: Netzwerk Bildphilosophie (Hg.), Bild und Methode. Theoretische Hintergründe und methodische Verfahren der Bildwissenschaft. Halem, Köln. Version 1: 2013 Responsible: Seitenbearbeitungen durch: Joerg R.J. Schirra — (Hinweis) |